Home
Selective and Arbitrary - No, no, no, just no.

lauredhel
Date: 2008-04-28 17:34
Subject: No, no, no, just no.
Security: Public

The Age: 'Groomer' jailed for sex with 12-year-old

[cut for child rape triggers]



A 27-year-old man who had a year-long sexual relationship


No, no he didn't.

with a 12-year-old neighbour has been jailed for three years.


No. He's been jailed for ten months. Not even as long as he was raping the girl for. She was systematically tortured for a year. He has had a mild slap, a shitload of sympathy, protection of his anonymity, and a few months in jail.

The man was living with his father and stepmother when he began "grooming" the girl.

No parties to the matter, including the judge, can be named for legal reasons.


No? Why not? How is it in the public interest for this man to be loose in the community in ten months' time, incognito?

The prosecutor told Melbourne County Court that the man wooed his teenage neighbour


No. She was twelve, not yet a teenager. [Hat tip to eeminy for picking this up.]

with flattery. "The prisoner would tell the complainant how gorgeous she was, he would say she looked like Drew Barrymore," he said.

He told the court the pair would go on walks and to the movies together and that the man gave her a mobile phone. "This was part of his grooming (of her) providing her with a clandestine means of communication," the prosecutor said.

The court heard the man told the girl he loved her. They discussed waiting to have sex until she was 16 so it would be legal, but a few weeks later he sent her a text message that said: "F--- it, we should have sex, we should not have to wait because we are in love."

The pair had sex regularly between July 2001 and July 2002.


No. No, they didn't.

Counsel for the man said his client suffered depression and was living in a fantasy world at the time.


No. Say after me: Depression does not cause rape. Depression does not cause paedophilia. Depression does not cause one year of ongoing rapes of a twelve year old child.

His psychologist told the court a symptom of his depression had been a fantasy of a stable and loving relationship that would lead to marriage and children.


And we should care about his fucked-up child-rape fantasies why?

How is "I really reeeeally wanted to get laid, so I groomed and repeatedly raped a 12 year old" a "defence"? How?

Today, the judge said he accepted the defence's submissions and agreed that the man's sentence be reduced, because of his mental state and the significant delay between charges being laid and his case coming before the court.

"You lived in a fantasy world and were not able to think rationally or act accordingly," the judge said.


No. Where is the evidence that he was floridly, completely, unthinkably out of touch with reality for twelve months straight? No. People that psychotic do not function in the community. Rape is not a mental illness.

"You are not a predator or pedophile and are not likely to re-offend in the future."


No.

Why is the judge not named? Why?

But he said the charges were very serious and demanded a term of imprisonment.


No, really?

"The offending involved some level of grooming and planning," he said.


"But just a little bit. Not really worth worrying about." No.

"The complainant was young vulnerable and the court has to take into account that these types of offences were introduced to protect the young persons who are susceptible to these types of approaches."

He said the victim felt she had been robbed of her childhood because of the relationship.

The man pleaded guilty to four representative counts of sexual penetration of a child under 16 and was sentenced to 36 months jail with 26 months suspended.


How did you get "jailed for three years" out of that, Sarah-Jane Collins?

This is monumentally fucked up.

Post A Comment | 11 Comments | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend | Link



...brain the size of a planet...
User: [info]bookgirlwa
Date: 2008-04-28 11:13 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

"You are not a predator or pedophile and are not likely to re-offend in the future."



Oh yes he is, yes he is, and yes he fucking will. Who is living in a fucking fantasy world again, oh unnamed judge???

And let's just discuss depression for a minute, hmmmm?? Not his, the child's inevitable struggle with the aftermath of all of this. Just a fucking boys club. Bastards.

Reply | Thread | Link



Emily
User: [info]eeminy
Date: 2008-04-28 18:24 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

You missed one:

The prosecutor told Melbourne County Court that the man wooed his teenage neighbour with flattery.

No, not "teenage neighbor". She was twelve. Not only well under legal consent, but younger than the linguistic boundary of adolescence as well.

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



lauredhel
User: [info]lauredhel
Date: 2008-04-28 18:26 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

Hey, I didn't pick up on that one. And that's one that looks... pretty deliberate.

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



Emily
User: [info]eeminy
Date: 2008-04-28 18:48 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

Not necessarily *deliberate* deliberate. The victim was probably 13 by the time the abuse ended, and certainly by the time it came to trial. It strikes me as part and parcel of the same willful blindness and truth-shading as the rest of the article.

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



lauredhel
User: [info]lauredhel
Date: 2008-04-28 19:01 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

Yes. I'm not sure the difference between accidentally on purpose and wilful blinkering and weaselwording is any more. There are such defined and clear and consistent patterns to these stories and the way they're communicated. (geographically-consistent too, within the USAOzandmaybeUK?NZ Anglosphere anyhow.)

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



lauredhel
User: [info]lauredhel
Date: 2008-04-28 18:25 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

The depression-as-defence script is right up my nose with an icepick.

"No, I didn't!"
"Well the slut was asking for it!"
"I was depressed!"

Always. In order. One-two-three.

It's fucked up on all levels, the massive insult and misrepresentation of depressive illnesses being a big one.

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



huckle
User: [info]huckle
Date: 2008-04-28 14:10 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

Well written.
That poor girl, she is left with a life sentence.

Reply | Thread | Link



lauredhel
User: [info]lauredhel
Date: 2008-04-28 18:26 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

*crying*

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



chocolate in the fruit bowl
User: [info]karenhealey
Date: 2008-04-28 15:03 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

Relationship my fucking ass.

Reply | Thread | Link



chocolate in the fruit bowl: ninja polar bear
User: [info]karenhealey
Date: 2008-04-28 15:10 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)
Keyword:ninja polar bear

(And I'm sorry, I always seem to respond to your posts with cussing. I mean no disrespect by it.)

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



lauredhel
User: [info]lauredhel
Date: 2008-04-28 16:56 (UTC)
Subject: (no subject)

Seems to me it's pretty much always appropriate and warranted. "Taboo" words aren't taboo here.

Reply | Parent | Thread | Link



browse
my journal
links
July 2009